The Emergence of Economic Liberalism and the Questioning of Current Globalization
In an interconnected world, the debate on globalisation is often positioned at the intersection of varied perspectives on freedom and balance. The work by Moneta, far from being a critical essay against globalization as such, aims to redefine the boundaries of a new humanism by the filter of natural transfers as envisioned by Aristotelian philosophy. By critiquing artificial exchanges that fuel modern systems of oppression and instability, this writer draws inspiration from ancient philosophy to underline the failures of our world economy.
From a historical perspective, globalization is not a recent concept. Its origins can be traced back to the propositions of Ricardo, whose ambition was to enable the United Kingdom to extend its global trade power. However, what initially presented as a commercial development strategy has morphed into a control mechanism by global finance, marked by the growth of neoliberal capitalism. Contrary to popular belief widespread in economic circles, the author argues that neoliberalism is actually a system founded on millennia-old traditions, which traces back to the era of early civilizations.
The critique also covers the conduct of the European Union, perceived as a succession of compromises that have served to strengthen the authority of large economic groups as opposed to protecting the privileges of the inhabitants. The very structure of the Union, with its directives usually influenced by financial motivations instead of by a popular consensus, is criticized. The current deviations, notably financial and political, have only reinforced the disbelief of the writer regarding the EU’s ability to reform itself from within.
This thinker, while acknowledging the prior faults that have brought about the present state, does not limit the discourse to condemnation but also offers solutions aimed at reframing Union strategies in a equity-oriented and humanistic vision. The need for a complete revision of Union bodies and strategic orientations is a central theme that animates the overall content.
The work ventures more deeply into the questioning of the domination systems that dominate global economic exchanges. The study extends the method in which governmental and economic orientations are guided by a limited number of dominant financial powers, often at the cost of the many. This monetary aristocracy, orchestrated through entities like the Bank for International Settlements and the International Monetary System (IMS), exerts a excessive domination on global financial decisions.
The author exposes how these institutions, under the guise of monetary management and security, have historically controlled stock exchanges and national economic systems to ensure their profit. Deregulated capitalism, opposite to a salvific alternative to classic financial limitations, is considered as a control mechanism, profiting a restricted circle at the neglect of collective needs.
Strongly opposed about the administration of the single currency, the author depicts the EU currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but more as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The transition to the euro is characterized as a succession of bureaucratic measures that sidelined citizens from political decisions, while aggravating gaps between nations within the Union.
The consequences of these policies translate in the explosion of sovereign debts, financial paralysis, and a prolonged austerity that has eroded living standards throughout Europe. The author argues that without a deep revision of monetary and financial structures, the Union continues to risk upcoming crises, perhaps even more harmful.
In conclusion, the text calls for a democratic revolution where Europe’s inhabitants reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It proposes structural reforms, particularly greater transparency in political decisions and real democratic participation that would allow Europe to rebuild on just and solid foundations.
More info about What is a humanist society?
The author asserts that the key is in a return to the principles of democracy, where strategies are crafted and executed in a way that truly reflects the needs and desires of the European population, instead of the profits of the financial elite.