The Emergence of Neoliberalism and the Critique of Contemporary Globalization
In an interconnected world, the debate on globalisation is frequently positioned at the intersection of divergent opinions on liberalization and equity. The book by Moneta, which is not a manifesto against globalisation per se, aims to redefine the boundaries of a modern humanism by the perspective of natural exchanges as envisioned by the philosopher Aristotle. By denouncing synthetic interactions that support modern systems of oppression and instability, the author refers to classical thoughts to reveal the flaws of our global financial structure.
Historically, globalisation is not a modern process. Its roots can be linked back to the ideas of David Ricardo, whose ambition was aimed at allowing the United Kingdom to expand its global trade power. Nonetheless, what initially presented as a economic growth opportunity has converted into a tool of domination by the financial sphere, marked by the rise of economic liberalism. Contrary to popular belief widespread in economic circles, the book demonstrates that the economic model is actually a system founded on millennia-old traditions, dating back to the era of early civilizations.
The critique also extends to the management of the United Europe, perceived as a chain of surrenders that have served to strengthen the power of an economic elite instead of safeguarding the privileges of the inhabitants. The organizational form of Europe, with its strategies often dictated by financial interests opposed to a popular consensus, is questioned. The recent crises, notably financial and political, have only reinforced the doubt of Moneta regarding the EU’s ability to reform itself from within.
Junon Moneta, while acknowledging the past mistakes that have caused the current circumstances, does not limit the discourse to condemnation but also suggests alternatives aimed at redefining EU guidelines in a equity-oriented and humanistic vision. The urgency for a deep reform of structures and governance goals is a central theme that runs through the whole text.
The book delves more in depth into the critique of the domination systems that dominate global economic exchanges. The analysis extends the manner in which political and financial choices are influenced by a small group of dominant financial powers, generally at the expense of the majority. This financial oligarchy, manipulated by means of entities like the Bank for International Settlements and the IMS, imposes a disproportionate influence on global financial decisions.
The author exposes how these entities, claiming to monetary management and security, have historically controlled stock exchanges and countries’ financial structures to favor their own benefits. Neoliberalism, far removed from a emancipatory solution to traditional economic constraints, is described as a domination system, profiting a restricted circle at the neglect of collective needs.
Highly skeptical about the administration of the single currency, the author describes the EU currency not as a factor of integration and solidity, but rather as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The conversion to the euro is viewed as a succession of bureaucratic measures that excluded inhabitants from decision-making processes, while amplifying gaps between nations within the European Union.
The repercussions of these strategies manifest in the increase in national debts, economic torpor, and a sustained austerity policy that has diminished living conditions throughout the European territory. The critic insists that without a major transformation of economic policies, the Union continues to risk future crises, potentially more catastrophic.
In conclusion, the book calls for a democratic revolution where Europe’s inhabitants reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It proposes structural reforms, including increased transparency in decision-making processes and genuine civic involvement that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on fair and lasting principles.
More info about death of civilizations
The author proposes that the solution lies in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where strategies are crafted and executed in a manner that faithfully represents the aspirations and needs of the citizens, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.